What is sinking this country today isn’t the American populace, it is the bad politicians and the greedy corporations.  In an ideal world, all politicos would be working solely for the public good.  In an ideal world, big corporations would use their power to help large quantities of people, both by providing desirable jobs and spending money on community enrichment programs.  Both of these things do happen; neither occur often enough.

But the American people ultimately control the power.  Without our consent, their can be no governance.  The outcry of a nation can be heard throughout the universe.  It is past time to be heard.

It starts, of course, with campaign contributions.  For too long we’ve allowed our attention to be diverted to minor issues while the elephant sits bloated in the room.  We’ve prevented lobbyists, who may be well educated in a subject, from becoming advisories.  My friends, it is not their knowledge we need fear, it is their money.  We’ve prevented them from giving large gifts, convinced by the very politicians themselves that this will end thee powerful influence of lobbying.  This is, in effect, dancing nimbly around the true sources of injustice, which are campaign contributions.

 There is a rule in place which allows for candidates to use public money to run their campaign.  And it seems every year, in a show of fairness, some campaigning politician promises to use this money to run their campaign… up until the point their private contributions exceeds the amount of the public fund.  See, if you use the public’s money, you can no longer use private contributions. 

If we were to end all campaign contributions and require all major politicians to run using only this set fund, the most effective campaigns would belong to those who handled their budget with thrift and efficiency.  This is in stark contrast to today’s campaign races, where often enough when the money starts to run dry, they put out a call for a fresh influx of dollars.

Who do you want creating the new national budget?  You have a choice, America.

Suspected North Korean prison camp locations

Img src http://www.hrnk.org/hiddengulag/toc.html

Oh Kil-nam is a South Korean economist who moved his family to Pyongyang, North Korea when officials promised him a good job and treatment for his wife’s hepatitis.  They recieved neither.  Instead, the couple spent several months studying the teachings of Kim Il Sung, the “Great Leader” and founding dictator of North Korea.  They were given jobs in a radio station, broadcasting political propaganda.

Oh was ordered to leave for Germany to recruit South Korean students to live in North Korea.  Neither his wife nor his two daughters were allowed to go with him.  Initially, he planned to return. Oh recalls that he and his wife argued bitterly about what he should do.

“She hit me in the face when I said I would come back with some South Koreans,” Oh said. “She said I could not have that on my conscience. She told me to leave North Korea and never come back. She told me to think of her and our daughters as being dead from a car accident.”

Upon reaching Germany, Oh defected and was granted political asylum.  His family disappeared within the North Korean gulag ‘camps’.  It is unknown whether they are alive or dead.

I would like to honor the brave Shin Sook-ja, who knowingly gave up the future and possibly the lives of herself and her family, so that her husband could escape.  Through her self-sacrifice, she also protected the lives of any students he may have brought back.  There is no greater act of nobility than to submit yourself to endless torture and degradation so that another can be free.  Let her story not be forgotten.  Let us always remember that these gulags exist in many countries around the world. 

We will not be free until all of humanity is freed, for our obligation binds us to aide our distressed brothers and sisters.

REFERENCE ARTICLE:
Washington Post Article: A family and a conscience, destroyed by North Korea’s cruelty
1994 Amnesty International Appeals Information on Shin Sook-ja (scroll down)
The Committee for Human Rights in North Korea (HRNK)

The latest US report shows that more than 1 in 10 juvenile offenders are molested or raped.  Around 85 percent of these occurences are at the hands of a staff member, rather than another inmate.  Surprisingly, 95 percent of all youth reporting staff sexual misconduct said they had been victimized by a female. 

For the full article, read:

Alternet: Shocking Report Reveals Epidemic of Sexual Abuse in Juvenile Prisons

I have the unenviable position of being neither for nor against this war.  Of course, I support the soldiers.  Then again, I also support humane treatment of all prisoners, even ones that don’t deserve it.  But whether or not you can justify the war at its inception, you can’t just send everyone home overnight, especially not when a war has been going on for as long as Afghanistan.  There’s probably a whole war-based economy by now that would collapse, for one (and no, I am not talking about the dealing of weapons).  Once you get past the inflammatory title, this is actually a well-rounded article that touches, if however briefly, on how complex these issues can be when viewed from different angles.

Obama’s Secret Prisons: Night Raids, Hidden Detention Centers, the “Black Jail” and the Dogs of War in Afghanistan

In the “Not Now” abstinence-only-until-marriage program, delivered to students in part of Mississippi, students participate in a mock wedding ceremony. As part of the ceremony, the bride presents the groom with a dirty sneaker as a wedding present. The dirty sneaker signifies “a lifestyle of impurity” and relays the message that no sock (representing a condom) could ever fully protect the foot from dirt and diseases. The groom, on the other hand, gives the bride a clean sneaker representing his “purity up until marriage.” At the end of the wedding activity, the students “pledged to remain pure” and bring clean tennis shoes to marriage.

While this is awful messaging in and of itself, research also shows that 88 percent of students who pledge to remain abstinent until marriage fail to keep this pledge and have the same STD rates as those who didn’t take a pledge. They are also less likely to use contraception when they do become sexually active.

All I can say is, what the hell?

REFERENCE:
This is an except pulled from http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/blog/.

Each year on January 22nd, folks on both sides of the abortion issue descend on the Capitol.

This year the March for Life (pro-life) will begin with a rally on the National Mall & 7th Street at noon. The march will go down Constitution Avenue and end at the Supreme Court.

Pro-choice organizations such as the National Organization for Women, Choice USA, and NARAL Pro-Choice will gather at noon at the Supreme Court, on 1rst Street NE between Maryland Avenue and East Capitol. Also, if you are registered as a clinic escort please contact the Planned Parenthood in the District. As the March for Life goes by the clinic, every year escorts are asked to stand together to help protect the clinic from potential acts of violence.

All groups will need to take the metro and, as many streets downtown will be closed, driving in the District is not advised.

The nice thing about being a extrovert in DC is I often learn the truth behind the fantastic news spewed from the press.  The media has this way of looking at issues from only one side, and then pushing that side as the only reasonable and sane way of looking at something.  It sounds perfectly logical when it is said on the television, but when I hear an opposing viewpoint from some knowledgeable soul in the city, their way sounds just as correct.  It pays to remember that the louder someone screams, the more obvious and simple the press makes their viewpoint out to be, the more likely it is some information just as relevant and diametrically opposed to that opinion exists.

Still, I can’t find the spin in the Franken rape amendment.  What happened at Halliburton was atrocious, to be sure, but it may be something in the wording of the bill itself (as presented by Franken) that caused thirty Senators to oppose it.  Congressman and senators love to pass feel-good fluff bills, so the fact that so many opposed this amendment makes me smell a dead rhinosaurus in the room.  My natural inclination is to believe in the utter corruption of Congress (which I know to be an unjust assumption) and I generally want to villify big business, male dominated environments, and sexual offenders.  This emotional charge makes it hard for me to take a step back and look at the facts logically, to ask the mundane questions.  Remember that even a miraculously wonderful bill may be scratched if the wrong miniscule clause is thrown in, and it is a common political tactic to hide sneaky self-serving (or publicly damaging) tidbits into much needed amendments.  Politics is all about throwing out the baby with the bathwater.

Where’s the damn spin?

For more information, visit: Huffington Post article

“The mission of the Internet Society is to promote the open development, evolution, and use of the Internet for the benefit of all people throughout the world.”

With these opportunities come new challenges. Will competing companies work together on critical standards or lock in customers using proprietary software? Will efforts to address Internet security vulnerabilities be successful?

Join us for an informal, wide-ranging discussion of where the Internet is headed. The Internet is forty years old but still evolving–at an accelerating pace. In the next ten years we will see even more growth and new applications than we’ve seen in the last forty. Entire industries will be transformed. The Internet of Things connecting hundreds of billions of devices and sensors, new mobile applications, cloud computing, and virtual worlds.

Discussion Leaders:

  • Leslie Daigle, Chief Internet Technology Officer, Internet Society
  • Eric Burger, Chief Technology Officer, Neustar
  • Steve Crocker, Internet pioneer and CEO, Shinkuro, Inc.

 
Moderator:

  • Michael R. Nelson, Visiting Professor, Internet Studies, CCT Georgetown University

Details, visit www.isoc-dc.org.

 This organization is the pivotal point of moderate.  They stress a non-agenda and wish only to be the forum for opposing groups to have a conversation to decide the future of the internet.

Just a quick article link:

Wiretapping On Americans

Seems that there is a new push to end terrorism by bringing jobs and hope to impoverished Muslim strongholds.   Outsourced call-centers teach employees English and provide America-based jobs, which also bolsters areas of economic distress while promoting friendly relations with the West.

Full Yahoo Article:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20090613/lf_afp/financeeconomyphilippinesunrestmuslimbusiness

WHY AREN’T WE DOING THIS WITH MEXICO?!  All the racists and rednecks constantly gripe about how the illegal immigrants are ‘taking all our jobs’ when really these are the jobs no one is willing to do, or do well, or do for the price American businesses and consumers demand.  Mexico and parts of Central America are so desperately impoverished, of course people would want to come to El Norte for a chance at a better job and life.  Our current economic crisis has done more to stem the tide of illegal immigration than any number of law enforcement officials or tactics.

We sit up here and fret and worry about the drug cartel violence spreading across our mutual border, yet all we want to do is bitch and put forth violent and useless options such as, “round up all the immigrants and send them a) back home, b) to jail, c)to their Maker (i.e. shoot them)”.  How about we help them fix their economic problems, and in doing so we ALSO SOLVE OUR OWN BORDER ISSUE.

Of course, this would involve some serious and open talks with the Mexican government, who would have to be willing to be helped.  We’d have to help them solve their endemic corruption problem to ensure goods/services coming from Mexico or Central America met our standards.  These are not small items, but it is a far better solution than the one found at the end of a gun.

 

Next Page »